Suraj Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Suraj?
In 2018 the rare name Suraj, ranked the 4,444th Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Uncommon, Suraj would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #1,949 in 1995.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 2003 with 54 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Suraj was less than 5, most recently in 1974.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Suraj occurred roughly during the years 1986-1995, and 1997-2000, whereas 2005-2008, and 2011-2014 were years of successive downward movement.
Suraj's popularity has been moving downward for some time. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Suraj lately has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Suraj?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a mid point.
The name Suraj is very unique and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Suraj (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 23 | 4,444 | |
2017 | 17 | 5,480 | |
2016 | 16 | 5,740 | |
2015 | 16 | 5,700 | |
2014 | 13 | 6,569 | |
2013 | 28 | 3,735 | |
2012 | 26 | 3,989 | |
2011 | 24 | 4,200 | |
2010 | 20 | 4,821 | |
2009 | 27 | 3,902 | |
2008 | 21 | 4,685 | |
2007 | 27 | 3,878 | |
2006 | 28 | 3,676 | |
2005 | 48 | 2,424 | |
2004 | 45 | 2,480 | |
2003 | 54 | 2,098 | |
2002 | 45 | 2,328 | |
2001 | 35 | 2,726 | |
2000 | 48 | 2,124 | |
1999 | 42 | 2,222 | |
1998 | 36 | 2,440 | |
1997 | 35 | 2,390 | |
1996 | 37 | 2,249 | |
1995 | 44 | 1,949 | |
1994 | 32 | 2,438 | |
1993 | 25 | 2,858 | |
1992 | 26 | 2,737 | |
1991 | 25 | 2,744 | |
1990 | 18 | 3,443 | |
1989 | 17 | 3,430 | |
1988 | 15 | 3,504 | |
1987 | 14 | 3,482 | |
1986 | 9 | 4,787 | |
1985 | 7 | 5,691 | |
1984 | 10 | 4,167 | |
1983 | 10 | 4,102 | |
1982 | 9 | 4,542 | |
1981 | 10 | 4,112 | |
1980 | 5 | 7,177 | |
1979 | 10 | 4,038 | |
1978 | 7 | 4,993 | |
1977 | 9 | 4,120 | |
1976 | 5 | 6,384 | |
1975 | 7 | 4,741 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |