Stacee Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Stacee?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Stacee would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1345 was reached in 1973 with 75 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Stacee in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Stacee, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1958-1961, 1964-1967, and 1970-1973, whereas clearly downward trends happened around 1973-1978.
For a number of years, the name Stacee has steadily decreased in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Stacee has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Stacee?
Stacee's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Stacee is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Stacee has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Stacee (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | 5 | 18,902 | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 6 | 17,221 | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 7 | 14,940 | |
2005 | 10 | 10,812 | |
2004 | 7 | 13,999 | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | 7 | 13,437 | |
2001 | 7 | 13,304 | |
2000 | 8 | 11,656 | |
1999 | 8 | 11,237 | |
1998 | 9 | 10,003 | |
1997 | 12 | 7,681 | |
1996 | 11 | 8,056 | |
1995 | 18 | 5,409 | |
1994 | 19 | 5,217 | |
1993 | 25 | 4,236 | |
1992 | 20 | 5,026 | |
1991 | 33 | 3,357 | |
1990 | 44 | 2,688 | |
1989 | 34 | 3,152 | |
1988 | 56 | 2,091 | |
1987 | 39 | 2,608 | |
1986 | 49 | 2,166 | |
1985 | 51 | 2,097 | |
1984 | 43 | 2,294 | |
1983 | 52 | 1,988 | |
1982 | 37 | 2,574 | |
1981 | 46 | 2,227 | |
1980 | 59 | 1,862 | |
1979 | 54 | 1,948 | |
1978 | 32 | 2,669 | |
1977 | 54 | 1,873 | |
1976 | 59 | 1,673 | |
1975 | 52 | 1,802 | |
1974 | 59 | 1,614 | |
1973 | 75 | 1,345 | |
1972 | 64 | 1,500 | |
1971 | 57 | 1,639 | |
1970 | 55 | 1,701 | |
1969 | 57 | 1,587 | |
1968 | 43 | 1,827 | |
1967 | 51 | 1,596 | |
1966 | 22 | 2,653 | |
1965 | 23 | 2,599 | |
1964 | 27 | 2,404 | |
1963 | 26 | 2,417 | |
1962 | 12 | 3,979 | |
1961 | 25 | 2,467 | |
1960 | 16 | 3,193 | |
1959 | 15 | 3,235 | |
1958 | 9 | 4,472 | |
1957 | 12 | 3,661 | |
1956 | 7 | 5,253 | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | 6 | 5,669 | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |