What's New
Fact of the Week
Shikha Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shikha?
In 2018 the rare name Shikha, ranked the 17,644th Most Popular Girls Name in the United States.Uncommon, Shikha would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #6,159 in 1983.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1996 with 14 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Shikha was less than 5, most recently in 2016.
Shikha's popularity has been moving downward for some time. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Shikha for their newborn has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shikha?
Shikha's popularity is at a mid point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shikha is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Shikha (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 5 | 17,644 | |
2017 | 6 | 15,608 | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 9 | 11,680 | |
2014 | 8 | 12,891 | |
2013 | 7 | 14,358 | |
2012 | 9 | 12,073 | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | 8 | 13,289 | |
2009 | 9 | 12,298 | |
2008 | 6 | 17,182 | |
2007 | 7 | 15,239 | |
2006 | 10 | 11,292 | |
2005 | 13 | 8,800 | |
2004 | 9 | 11,475 | |
2003 | 6 | 15,477 | |
2002 | 7 | 13,412 | |
2001 | 10 | 9,996 | |
2000 | 6 | 14,749 | |
1999 | 10 | 9,374 | |
1998 | 8 | 10,993 | |
1997 | 7 | 11,906 | |
1996 | 14 | 6,685 | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | 12 | 7,542 | |
1993 | 7 | 11,618 | |
1992 | 5 | 15,242 | |
1991 | 9 | 9,240 | |
1990 | 5 | 14,922 | |
1989 | 12 | 6,902 | |
1988 | 8 | 9,114 | |
1987 | 8 | 8,645 | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | 7 | 9,148 | |
1984 | 6 | 10,188 | |
1983 | 11 | 6,159 | |
1982 | 8 | 8,105 | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |