Sheetal Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Sheetal?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Sheetal would be a striking name choice.
Position 3715, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1981 with 22 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Sheetal was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
The popularity trend for Sheetal has been moving downward for a while. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Sheetal for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Sheetal?
Sheetal's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Sheetal is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Sheetal (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | 5 | 17,977 |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | 7 | 13,257 |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | 7 | 12,224 |
| 1997 | | 10 | 8,924 |
| 1996 | | 5 | 15,502 |
| 1995 | | 7 | 11,600 |
| 1994 | | 6 | 13,175 |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | 5 | 15,217 |
| 1991 | | 8 | 10,112 |
| 1990 | | 8 | 10,034 |
| 1989 | | 7 | 10,664 |
| 1988 | | 7 | 10,215 |
| 1987 | | 8 | 8,634 |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | 10 | 6,868 |
| 1984 | | 7 | 8,980 |
| 1983 | | 20 | 3,921 |
| 1982 | | 18 | 4,305 |
| 1981 | | 22 | 3,715 |
| 1980 | | 14 | 5,192 |
| 1979 | | 20 | 3,884 |
| 1978 | | 7 | 8,383 |
| 1977 | | 12 | 5,474 |
| 1976 | | 12 | 5,144 |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | 9 | 6,160 |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | 10 | 5,406 |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |