What's New
Fact of the Week
Sharlie Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Sharlie?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Sharlie would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1764 was reached in 1933 with 20 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Sharlie in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Sharlie has been moving downward in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Sharlie has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Sharlie?
Sharlie's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Sharlie is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Sharlie (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 5 | 18,414 | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 6 | 15,767 | |
2003 | 7 | 13,605 | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 5 | 17,180 | |
1999 | 9 | 10,205 | |
1998 | 5 | 16,185 | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | 6 | 13,209 | |
1995 | 7 | 11,582 | |
1994 | 6 | 13,150 | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 7 | 11,509 | |
1991 | 10 | 8,499 | |
1990 | 9 | 9,120 | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 10 | 7,579 | |
1987 | 9 | 7,885 | |
1986 | 9 | 7,643 | |
1985 | 19 | 4,257 | |
1984 | 6 | 10,152 | |
1983 | 15 | 4,844 | |
1982 | 7 | 9,027 | |
1981 | 5 | 11,834 | |
1980 | 10 | 6,689 | |
1979 | 10 | 6,599 | |
1978 | 11 | 5,894 | |
1977 | 11 | 5,821 | |
1976 | 11 | 5,526 | |
1975 | 10 | 5,900 | |
1974 | 7 | 7,527 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 5 | 9,071 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | 6 | 5,965 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | 9 | 4,227 | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | 5 | 6,278 | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | 6 | 5,207 | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | 6 | 5,212 | |
1946 | 7 | 4,345 | |
1945 | 8 | 3,639 | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | 6 | 4,618 | |
1942 | 9 | 3,401 | |
1941 | 5 | 4,984 | |
1940 | 8 | 3,472 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | 10 | 2,906 | |
1933 | 20 | 1,764 | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |