Pocahontas Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Pocahontas?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Pocahontas would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #1,150 in 1897.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1925 with 12 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Pocahontas was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Pocahontas's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Pocahontas lately has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Pocahontas?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Pocahontas is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Pocahont. (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 5 | 18,176 | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | 5 | 5,209 | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | 6 | 4,242 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | 6 | 4,237 | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | 6 | 4,058 | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | 6 | 4,194 | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | 10 | 3,002 | |
1931 | 7 | 3,782 | |
1930 | 5 | 5,106 | |
1929 | 6 | 4,470 | |
1928 | 8 | 3,683 | |
1927 | 5 | 5,450 | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | 12 | 2,905 | |
1924 | 6 | 4,926 | |
1923 | 10 | 3,311 | |
1922 | 8 | 3,939 | |
1921 | 8 | 3,955 | |
1920 | 6 | 4,856 | |
1919 | 6 | 4,700 | |
1918 | 7 | 4,194 | |
1917 | 7 | 4,014 | |
1916 | 6 | 4,299 | |
1915 | 6 | 4,163 | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | 7 | 2,759 | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | 8 | 1,927 | |
1910 | 9 | 1,740 | |
1909 | 6 | 2,171 | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | 6 | 2,010 | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | 5 | 2,116 | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | 9 | 1,150 | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |