Neelam Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Neelam?
Less than 5 babies were given the name Neelam in the United States in 2018.Neelam, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Position 3876, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1990 with 27 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Neelam in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Where is the name Neelam popularity headed?
Neelam's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The popularity trend for Neelam has been moving downward for a while. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Neelam has dropped.
The name Neelam is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
for Percentages.| Neelam (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | 10 | 10,480 |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | 5 | 18,331 |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | 6 | 15,965 |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | 5 | 18,756 |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | 5 | 18,375 |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | 6 | 14,884 |
| 2001 | | 10 | 9,892 |
| 2000 | | 6 | 14,482 |
| 1999 | | 9 | 10,088 |
| 1998 | | 6 | 13,627 |
| 1997 | | 10 | 8,827 |
| 1996 | | 11 | 7,956 |
| 1995 | | 13 | 6,915 |
| 1994 | | 11 | 7,981 |
| 1993 | | 15 | 6,167 |
| 1992 | | 25 | 4,184 |
| 1991 | | 13 | 6,859 |
| 1990 | | 27 | 3,876 |
| 1989 | | 18 | 4,991 |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | 12 | 6,206 |
| 1986 | | 6 | 10,453 |
| 1985 | | 5 | 11,887 |
| 1984 | | 6 | 9,950 |
| 1983 | | 7 | 8,679 |
| 1982 | | 8 | 7,972 |
| 1981 | | 5 | 11,561 |
| 1980 | | 7 | 8,758 |
| 1979 | | 6 | 9,790 |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | 6 | 8,863 |
| 1975 | | 5 | 10,066 |
| 1974 | | 9 | 6,083 |
| 1973 | | 6 | 8,082 |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | 5 | 9,187 |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |