What's New
Fact of the Week
Lesleigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Lesleigh?
Ranking 13,159th in popularity in the United States for girls in 2018, the name Lesleigh is rare.Lesleigh, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Its highest popularity ranking of #3729 was reached in 1971 with 17 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Lesleigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2017.
Lesleigh's popularity is at a mid point when measured against its most notable year.
How popular will Lesleigh be?
For a number of years, the name Lesleigh has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Lesleigh has dropped.
The name Lesleigh is mostly unused and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
for Percentages.| Lesleigh (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | 7 | 13,159 |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | 6 | 15,398 |
| 2015 | | 5 | 17,974 |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | 10 | 10,672 |
| 2012 | | 7 | 14,359 |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | 5 | 18,651 |
| 2009 | | 5 | 18,951 |
| 2008 | | 7 | 14,703 |
| 2007 | | 11 | 10,529 |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | 11 | 9,844 |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | 6 | 14,948 |
| 2002 | | 5 | 17,007 |
| 2001 | | 9 | 10,620 |
| 2000 | | 7 | 12,567 |
| 1999 | | 5 | 15,798 |
| 1998 | | 8 | 10,691 |
| 1997 | | 12 | 7,548 |
| 1996 | | 7 | 11,270 |
| 1995 | | 14 | 6,470 |
| 1994 | | 13 | 6,906 |
| 1993 | | 15 | 6,130 |
| 1992 | | 12 | 7,313 |
| 1991 | | 11 | 7,727 |
| 1990 | | 12 | 7,122 |
| 1989 | | 16 | 5,442 |
| 1988 | | 9 | 8,095 |
| 1987 | | 15 | 5,204 |
| 1986 | | 7 | 9,105 |
| 1985 | | 9 | 7,293 |
| 1984 | | 11 | 6,111 |
| 1983 | | 14 | 5,026 |
| 1982 | | 14 | 5,090 |
| 1981 | | 15 | 4,850 |
| 1980 | | 12 | 5,739 |
| 1979 | | 17 | 4,330 |
| 1978 | | 12 | 5,391 |
| 1977 | | 7 | 8,012 |
| 1976 | | 8 | 6,981 |
| 1975 | | 12 | 5,020 |
| 1974 | | 10 | 5,578 |
| 1973 | | 8 | 6,396 |
| 1972 | | 8 | 6,280 |
| 1971 | | 17 | 3,729 |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | 8 | 5,739 |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | 7 | 5,558 |
| 1965 | | 7 | 5,554 |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | 8 | 5,103 |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | 6 | 6,243 |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | 8 | 4,733 |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | 6 | 5,036 |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |