Keeleigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Keeleigh?
The rare name Keeleigh was the 14,660th Most Popular Girls Name in the United States in 2018.Keeleigh, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Position 4584, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 2008 with 33 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Keeleigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1995.
Keeleigh, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 2004-2008, whereas clearly downward trends happened around 2010-2013.
Where is the name Keeleigh popularity headed?
Keeleigh's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The popularity trend for Keeleigh has steadily decreased for a while. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Keeleigh has dropped significantly.
The name Keeleigh is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Keeleigh (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 6 | 14,660 | |
2017 | 12 | 9,026 | |
2016 | 17 | 7,052 | |
2015 | 12 | 9,207 | |
2014 | 28 | 4,950 | |
2013 | 16 | 7,561 | |
2012 | 18 | 7,006 | |
2011 | 25 | 5,451 | |
2010 | 27 | 5,170 | |
2009 | 23 | 5,986 | |
2008 | 33 | 4,584 | |
2007 | 27 | 5,303 | |
2006 | 17 | 7,311 | |
2005 | 12 | 9,158 | |
2004 | 17 | 6,934 | |
2003 | 21 | 5,688 | |
2002 | 9 | 10,655 | |
2001 | 20 | 5,702 | |
2000 | 8 | 11,254 | |
1999 | 8 | 10,867 | |
1998 | 12 | 7,783 | |
1997 | 9 | 9,407 | |
1996 | 6 | 12,619 | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | 6 | 12,569 | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |