Judit Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Judit?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Judit would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #5114 was reached in 1999.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 2004 with 23 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Judit in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Judit occurred roughly during the years 1988-1991.
For a number of years, the name Judit has been spiralling downward in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Judit has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Judit?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Judit is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Judit (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | 6 | 14,894 | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 8 | 12,338 | |
2014 | 8 | 12,437 | |
2013 | 12 | 9,276 | |
2012 | 5 | 18,086 | |
2011 | 14 | 8,392 | |
2010 | 14 | 8,470 | |
2009 | 10 | 11,036 | |
2008 | 22 | 6,239 | |
2007 | 21 | 6,428 | |
2006 | 20 | 6,465 | |
2005 | 22 | 5,680 | |
2004 | 23 | 5,450 | |
2003 | 18 | 6,426 | |
2002 | 16 | 6,856 | |
2001 | 16 | 6,778 | |
2000 | 15 | 6,972 | |
1999 | 21 | 5,114 | |
1998 | 16 | 6,192 | |
1997 | 17 | 5,732 | |
1996 | 15 | 6,194 | |
1995 | 17 | 5,546 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,421 | |
1993 | 13 | 6,806 | |
1992 | 19 | 5,139 | |
1991 | 18 | 5,274 | |
1990 | 13 | 6,630 | |
1989 | 7 | 10,182 | |
1988 | 6 | 10,964 | |
1987 | 7 | 9,224 | |
1986 | 10 | 6,811 | |
1985 | 9 | 7,214 | |
1984 | 7 | 8,553 | |
1983 | 11 | 5,975 | |
1982 | 7 | 8,620 | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | 8 | 7,711 | |
1979 | 5 | 10,883 | |
1978 | 7 | 7,997 | |
1977 | 6 | 8,928 | |
1976 | 7 | 7,626 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 5 | 8,563 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | 5 | 6,533 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |