Juanisha Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Juanisha?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Juanisha would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #5663 was reached in 1989 with 15 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Juanisha was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Juanisha occurred roughly during the years 1991-1995.
For a number of years, the name Juanisha has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Juanisha for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Juanisha?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Juanisha is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Juanisha (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | 5 | 16,675 | |
2001 | 6 | 14,342 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | 11 | 8,019 | |
1996 | 10 | 8,457 | |
1995 | 15 | 6,094 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,420 | |
1993 | 11 | 7,754 | |
1992 | 11 | 7,748 | |
1991 | 9 | 8,924 | |
1990 | 7 | 10,711 | |
1989 | 15 | 5,663 | |
1988 | 10 | 7,367 | |
1987 | 5 | 12,110 | |
1986 | 6 | 10,074 | |
1985 | 7 | 8,719 | |
1984 | 6 | 9,638 | |
1983 | 5 | 10,989 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 6 | 9,616 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | 6 | 9,465 | |
1978 | 7 | 7,996 | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 6 | 8,428 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |