Joshawa Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Joshawa?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Joshawa would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2042 was reached in 1985 with 28 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Joshawa was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Joshawa occurred roughly during the years 1976-1981.
For a number of years, the name Joshawa has been spiralling downward in popularity. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Joshawa for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Joshawa?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Joshawa is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
*Mouse over the charts or scroll down to the table for data details.
Joshawa (Boy) | |
Joshawa (Boy) | |
Joshawa (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | 7 | 10,148 | |
2010 | 11 | 7,306 | |
2009 | 6 | 11,667 | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | 7 | 10,299 | |
2006 | 7 | 10,095 | |
2005 | 8 | 8,682 | |
2004 | 9 | 7,854 | |
2003 | 8 | 8,208 | |
2002 | 14 | 5,256 | |
2001 | 11 | 6,217 | |
2000 | 13 | 5,433 | |
1999 | 15 | 4,646 | |
1998 | 13 | 5,012 | |
1997 | 9 | 6,349 | |
1996 | 7 | 7,528 | |
1995 | 14 | 4,396 | |
1994 | 10 | 5,659 | |
1993 | 13 | 4,579 | |
1992 | 10 | 5,430 | |
1991 | 19 | 3,268 | |
1990 | 22 | 2,908 | |
1989 | 26 | 2,509 | |
1988 | 26 | 2,331 | |
1987 | 19 | 2,774 | |
1986 | 14 | 3,344 | |
1985 | 28 | 2,042 | |
1984 | 26 | 2,068 | |
1983 | 21 | 2,378 | |
1982 | 21 | 2,377 | |
1981 | 24 | 2,165 | |
1980 | 21 | 2,405 | |
1979 | 11 | 3,685 | |
1978 | 11 | 3,498 | |
1977 | 13 | 3,110 | |
1976 | 7 | 4,661 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | 7 | 4,388 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |