Joselito Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Joselito?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Joselito would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1415 was reached in 1973 with 36 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Joselito was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Joselito occurred roughly during the years 1964-1969, and 1987-1990, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1973-1978.
For a number of years, the name Joselito has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Joselito for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Joselito?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Joselito is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Joselito (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | 8 | 9,258 | |
2011 | 7 | 10,146 | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 9 | 8,642 | |
2007 | 7 | 10,298 | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 7 | 9,417 | |
2003 | 10 | 6,970 | |
2002 | 9 | 7,314 | |
2001 | 8 | 7,899 | |
2000 | 12 | 5,734 | |
1999 | 13 | 5,165 | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | 11 | 5,461 | |
1996 | 19 | 3,606 | |
1995 | 12 | 4,952 | |
1994 | 14 | 4,410 | |
1993 | 18 | 3,570 | |
1992 | 11 | 5,049 | |
1991 | 12 | 4,618 | |
1990 | 24 | 2,736 | |
1989 | 15 | 3,717 | |
1988 | 9 | 4,987 | |
1987 | 7 | 5,767 | |
1986 | 12 | 3,750 | |
1985 | 13 | 3,509 | |
1984 | 9 | 4,378 | |
1983 | 11 | 3,736 | |
1982 | 18 | 2,646 | |
1981 | 10 | 3,991 | |
1980 | 21 | 2,404 | |
1979 | 20 | 2,423 | |
1978 | 12 | 3,300 | |
1977 | 16 | 2,729 | |
1976 | 30 | 1,726 | |
1975 | 25 | 1,914 | |
1974 | 26 | 1,808 | |
1973 | 36 | 1,415 | |
1972 | 24 | 1,848 | |
1971 | 27 | 1,727 | |
1970 | 29 | 1,595 | |
1969 | 29 | 1,511 | |
1968 | 23 | 1,663 | |
1967 | 23 | 1,623 | |
1966 | 15 | 2,096 | |
1965 | 14 | 2,217 | |
1964 | 14 | 2,256 | |
1963 | 15 | 2,158 | |
1962 | 16 | 2,076 | |
1961 | 12 | 2,471 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |