Jinny Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jinny?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jinny would be a striking name choice.
Position 2763, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1948.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1977 with 27 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Jinny was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Jinny occurred roughly during the years 1951-1955, 1956-1959, 1967-1970, and 1971-1974.
The popularity trend for Jinny has steadily decreased for a while. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Jinny for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jinny?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Jinny is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Jinny (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 5 | 17,641 | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 7 | 14,237 | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 11 | 9,531 | |
2003 | 6 | 14,677 | |
2002 | 7 | 12,801 | |
2001 | 6 | 14,312 | |
2000 | 7 | 12,378 | |
1999 | 8 | 10,786 | |
1998 | 12 | 7,748 | |
1997 | 6 | 12,785 | |
1996 | 16 | 5,899 | |
1995 | 5 | 14,395 | |
1994 | 11 | 7,832 | |
1993 | 13 | 6,800 | |
1992 | 8 | 9,885 | |
1991 | 15 | 6,072 | |
1990 | 12 | 7,058 | |
1989 | 11 | 7,183 | |
1988 | 17 | 4,932 | |
1987 | 11 | 6,505 | |
1986 | 18 | 4,432 | |
1985 | 25 | 3,459 | |
1984 | 21 | 3,782 | |
1983 | 17 | 4,352 | |
1982 | 21 | 3,826 | |
1981 | 19 | 4,062 | |
1980 | 23 | 3,550 | |
1979 | 18 | 4,111 | |
1978 | 22 | 3,431 | |
1977 | 27 | 2,940 | |
1976 | 11 | 5,365 | |
1975 | 14 | 4,435 | |
1974 | 22 | 3,149 | |
1973 | 17 | 3,695 | |
1972 | 14 | 4,176 | |
1971 | 13 | 4,397 | |
1970 | 16 | 3,776 | |
1969 | 10 | 4,847 | |
1968 | 12 | 4,094 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | 8 | 5,037 | |
1965 | 15 | 3,319 | |
1964 | 8 | 5,192 | |
1963 | 10 | 4,376 | |
1962 | 11 | 4,112 | |
1961 | 14 | 3,521 | |
1960 | 5 | 6,771 | |
1959 | 18 | 2,806 | |
1958 | 13 | 3,444 | |
1957 | 12 | 3,560 | |
1956 | 14 | 3,239 | |
1955 | 15 | 3,033 | |
1954 | 13 | 3,226 | |
1953 | 10 | 3,819 | |
1952 | 10 | 3,657 | |
1951 | 9 | 3,834 | |
1950 | 10 | 3,535 | |
1949 | 8 | 4,046 | |
1948 | 14 | 2,763 | |
1947 | 12 | 3,142 | |
1946 | 9 | 3,529 | |
1945 | 9 | 3,255 | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | 11 | 2,943 | |
1942 | 10 | 3,086 | |
1941 | 5 | 4,705 | |
1940 | 8 | 3,348 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |