Jenalyn Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jenalyn?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jenalyn would be a striking name choice.
Position 6201, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1985.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1995 with 12 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Jenalyn was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
The popularity trend for Jenalyn has been moving downward for a while. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Jenalyn lately has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jenalyn?
Jenalyn's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Jenalyn is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
for Percentages.| Jenalyn (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | 8 | 12,082 |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | 6 | 15,290 |
| 2014 | | 11 | 9,798 |
| 2013 | | 6 | 15,412 |
| 2012 | | 6 | 15,780 |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | 6 | 15,812 |
| 2009 | | 10 | 11,005 |
| 2008 | | 6 | 16,286 |
| 2007 | | 5 | 18,842 |
| 2006 | | 7 | 14,207 |
| 2005 | | 9 | 11,293 |
| 2004 | | 7 | 13,356 |
| 2003 | | 9 | 10,793 |
| 2002 | | 5 | 16,587 |
| 2001 | | 8 | 11,453 |
| 2000 | | 10 | 9,468 |
| 1999 | | 8 | 10,771 |
| 1998 | | 7 | 11,661 |
| 1997 | | 7 | 11,350 |
| 1996 | | 7 | 11,055 |
| 1995 | | 12 | 7,239 |
| 1994 | | 10 | 8,401 |
| 1993 | | 7 | 11,060 |
| 1992 | | 5 | 14,172 |
| 1991 | | 10 | 8,223 |
| 1990 | | 7 | 10,661 |
| 1989 | | 6 | 11,404 |
| 1988 | | 9 | 7,965 |
| 1987 | | 6 | 10,389 |
| 1986 | | 7 | 8,923 |
| 1985 | | 11 | 6,201 |
| 1984 | | 10 | 6,475 |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | 8 | 7,751 |
| 1981 | | 6 | 9,553 |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | 5 | 10,833 |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |