Jazzmen Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jazzmen?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jazzmen would be a striking name choice.
Position 3000, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1994 with 39 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Jazzmen was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1985-1991, the name Jazzmen took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1994-2000.
The popularity trend for Jazzmen has been spiralling downward for a while. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Jazzmen for their newborn has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jazzmen?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jazzmen is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Jazzmen has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Jazzmen (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | 6 | 15,408 | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | 8 | 12,793 | |
2009 | 5 | 18,518 | |
2008 | 10 | 11,143 | |
2007 | 7 | 14,551 | |
2006 | 14 | 8,446 | |
2005 | 13 | 8,547 | |
2004 | 13 | 8,455 | |
2003 | 16 | 7,024 | |
2002 | 21 | 5,550 | |
2001 | 12 | 8,429 | |
2000 | 12 | 8,241 | |
1999 | 18 | 5,760 | |
1998 | 18 | 5,677 | |
1997 | 25 | 4,274 | |
1996 | 26 | 4,107 | |
1995 | 29 | 3,705 | |
1994 | 39 | 3,000 | |
1993 | 28 | 3,820 | |
1992 | 34 | 3,295 | |
1991 | 35 | 3,178 | |
1990 | 17 | 5,379 | |
1989 | 24 | 4,051 | |
1988 | 14 | 5,725 | |
1987 | 17 | 4,740 | |
1986 | 9 | 7,360 | |
1985 | 5 | 11,346 | |
1984 | 6 | 9,595 | |
1983 | 7 | 8,388 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |