Janicia Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Janicia?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Janicia would be a striking name choice.
Position 7132, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1991.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1998 with 13 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Janicia in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
The popularity trend for Janicia has been spiralling downward for a while. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Janicia has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Janicia?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Janicia is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Janicia (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 5 | 17,539 | |
2014 | 8 | 12,380 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | 6 | 15,742 | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 10 | 11,125 | |
2007 | 5 | 18,786 | |
2006 | 10 | 10,928 | |
2005 | 5 | 17,557 | |
2004 | 7 | 13,321 | |
2003 | 7 | 12,990 | |
2002 | 10 | 9,795 | |
2001 | 8 | 11,435 | |
2000 | 9 | 10,229 | |
1999 | 8 | 10,746 | |
1998 | 13 | 7,276 | |
1997 | 11 | 7,991 | |
1996 | 8 | 9,930 | |
1995 | 8 | 9,939 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,389 | |
1993 | 11 | 7,723 | |
1992 | 12 | 7,212 | |
1991 | 12 | 7,132 | |
1990 | 6 | 11,948 | |
1989 | 8 | 9,065 | |
1988 | 6 | 10,888 | |
1987 | 6 | 10,365 | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |