Jamielee Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jamielee?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jamielee would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2325 was reached in 1985 with 43 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Jamielee in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1979-1985, the name Jamielee took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 1990-1997.
For a number of years, the name Jamielee has been moving downward in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Jamielee has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jamielee?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jamielee is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Jamielee has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Jamielee (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | 6 | 14,811 | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | 6 | 15,736 | |
2011 | 5 | 17,885 | |
2010 | 8 | 12,764 | |
2009 | 6 | 16,024 | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | 6 | 16,301 | |
2006 | 5 | 18,307 | |
2005 | 11 | 9,726 | |
2004 | 10 | 10,219 | |
2003 | 7 | 12,972 | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 5 | 16,360 | |
2000 | 6 | 13,860 | |
1999 | 12 | 7,913 | |
1998 | 7 | 11,632 | |
1997 | 10 | 8,604 | |
1996 | 10 | 8,417 | |
1995 | 17 | 5,527 | |
1994 | 14 | 6,459 | |
1993 | 15 | 6,076 | |
1992 | 19 | 5,129 | |
1991 | 22 | 4,555 | |
1990 | 26 | 3,943 | |
1989 | 24 | 4,049 | |
1988 | 20 | 4,371 | |
1987 | 23 | 3,782 | |
1986 | 35 | 2,747 | |
1985 | 43 | 2,325 | |
1984 | 22 | 3,648 | |
1983 | 19 | 4,005 | |
1982 | 24 | 3,456 | |
1981 | 9 | 7,008 | |
1980 | 8 | 7,665 | |
1979 | 5 | 10,801 | |
1978 | 6 | 8,947 | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |