Jamez Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jamez?
In 2018 the rare name Jamez, ranked the 7,780th Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Uncommon, Jamez would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #3152 was reached in 2003.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2010 with 31 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Jamez was less than 5, most recently in 1988.
Approximately during the years 1992-1995, 1998-2003, and 2007-2010 the name Jamez took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
For a number of years, the name Jamez has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Jamez for their newborn has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jamez?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jamez is mostly unused and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
Jamez (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 10 | 7,780 | |
2017 | 11 | 7,281 | |
2016 | 11 | 7,322 | |
2015 | 20 | 4,779 | |
2014 | 13 | 6,435 | |
2013 | 21 | 4,522 | |
2012 | 26 | 3,940 | |
2011 | 27 | 3,829 | |
2010 | 31 | 3,487 | |
2009 | 25 | 4,082 | |
2008 | 21 | 4,606 | |
2007 | 23 | 4,280 | |
2006 | 30 | 3,469 | |
2005 | 14 | 5,689 | |
2004 | 20 | 4,329 | |
2003 | 30 | 3,152 | |
2002 | 24 | 3,602 | |
2001 | 19 | 4,195 | |
2000 | 18 | 4,278 | |
1999 | 18 | 4,066 | |
1998 | 12 | 5,268 | |
1997 | 11 | 5,431 | |
1996 | 12 | 5,003 | |
1995 | 19 | 3,486 | |
1994 | 12 | 4,925 | |
1993 | 14 | 4,328 | |
1992 | 10 | 5,390 | |
1991 | 12 | 4,596 | |
1990 | 18 | 3,372 | |
1989 | 9 | 5,347 | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | 8 | 5,154 | |
1986 | 6 | 6,261 | |
1985 | 5 | 6,981 | |
1984 | 6 | 5,887 | |
1983 | 6 | 5,796 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 5 | 6,705 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |