Jackquelyn Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jackquelyn?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jackquelyn would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #3,802 in 1953.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1963 with 11 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Jackquelyn was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Jackquelyn's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Jackquelyn for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jackquelyn?
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jackquelyn is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Jackquel. (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 6 | 15,885 | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 6 | 13,827 | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | 5 | 14,290 | |
1994 | 5 | 14,252 | |
1993 | 6 | 12,375 | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | 6 | 11,357 | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | 5 | 10,969 | |
1979 | 7 | 8,353 | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 6 | 8,851 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 8 | 6,740 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | 5 | 8,746 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 6 | 7,400 | |
1969 | 8 | 5,636 | |
1968 | 9 | 4,904 | |
1967 | 10 | 4,414 | |
1966 | 9 | 4,633 | |
1965 | 5 | 6,899 | |
1964 | 9 | 4,755 | |
1963 | 11 | 4,115 | |
1962 | 8 | 5,034 | |
1961 | 8 | 5,046 | |
1960 | 6 | 5,961 | |
1959 | 8 | 4,780 | |
1958 | 7 | 5,087 | |
1957 | 6 | 5,680 | |
1956 | 8 | 4,612 | |
1955 | 10 | 3,898 | |
1954 | 9 | 4,095 | |
1953 | 10 | 3,802 | |
1952 | 9 | 3,939 | |
1951 | 7 | 4,555 | |
1950 | 8 | 4,105 | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | 7 | 4,362 | |
1947 | 9 | 3,846 | |
1946 | 7 | 4,167 | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |