Jacinda Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jacinda?
In 2018 the rare name Jacinda, ranked the 6,862nd Most Popular Girls Name in the United States.Uncommon, Jacinda would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #1,093 in 1996 with 169 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Jacinda in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1961.
Approximately during the years 1964-1967, 1968-1971, 1988-1991, and 1993-1996, the name Jacinda took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 2007-2011.
Jacinda's popularity has been spiralling downward for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Jacinda has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jacinda?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jacinda is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Jacinda has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Jacinda (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 17 | 6,862 | |
2017 | 11 | 9,541 | |
2016 | 19 | 6,512 | |
2015 | 28 | 4,892 | |
2014 | 19 | 6,542 | |
2013 | 28 | 4,939 | |
2012 | 43 | 3,668 | |
2011 | 32 | 4,486 | |
2010 | 41 | 3,765 | |
2009 | 50 | 3,315 | |
2008 | 55 | 3,094 | |
2007 | 74 | 2,524 | |
2006 | 85 | 2,253 | |
2005 | 64 | 2,650 | |
2004 | 67 | 2,511 | |
2003 | 78 | 2,211 | |
2002 | 107 | 1,713 | |
2001 | 89 | 1,944 | |
2000 | 101 | 1,732 | |
1999 | 125 | 1,410 | |
1998 | 131 | 1,342 | |
1997 | 139 | 1,269 | |
1996 | 169 | 1,093 | |
1995 | 121 | 1,362 | |
1994 | 79 | 1,815 | |
1993 | 105 | 1,504 | |
1992 | 114 | 1,426 | |
1991 | 105 | 1,494 | |
1990 | 88 | 1,676 | |
1989 | 88 | 1,591 | |
1988 | 80 | 1,622 | |
1987 | 91 | 1,437 | |
1986 | 93 | 1,381 | |
1985 | 82 | 1,499 | |
1984 | 74 | 1,540 | |
1983 | 84 | 1,404 | |
1982 | 71 | 1,626 | |
1981 | 87 | 1,409 | |
1980 | 71 | 1,627 | |
1979 | 89 | 1,382 | |
1978 | 84 | 1,391 | |
1977 | 80 | 1,405 | |
1976 | 59 | 1,665 | |
1975 | 83 | 1,320 | |
1974 | 94 | 1,190 | |
1973 | 91 | 1,187 | |
1972 | 86 | 1,227 | |
1971 | 93 | 1,215 | |
1970 | 63 | 1,548 | |
1969 | 63 | 1,487 | |
1968 | 49 | 1,655 | |
1967 | 54 | 1,528 | |
1966 | 41 | 1,779 | |
1965 | 31 | 2,130 | |
1964 | 34 | 2,050 | |
1963 | 34 | 2,034 | |
1962 | 9 | 4,670 | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |