What's New
Word of the Week
Jaafar Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jaafar?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jaafar would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #7110 was reached in 1993 with 7 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Jaafar in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Jaafar has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Jaafar has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jaafar?
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jaafar is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Jaafar (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | 7 | 9,952 |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | 6 | 11,322 |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | 5 | 13,018 |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | 6 | 11,612 |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | 6 | 10,608 |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | 6 | 9,863 |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | 7 | 7,600 |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | 5 | 9,379 |
| 1993 | | 7 | 7,110 |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1989 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |