Hayleigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Hayleigh?
The rare name Hayleigh was the 1,989th Most Popular Girls Name in the United States in 2018.Hayleigh, although not presently in the top 1000, did once enjoy higher rankings.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #832 was reached in 2011.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2010 with 321 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Hayleigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1985.
Approximately during the years 1987-2001, the name Hayleigh took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 2011-2017.
Where is the name Hayleigh popularity headed?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
For a number of years, the name Hayleigh has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Hayleigh has dropped significantly.
The name Hayleigh is quite distinctive and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
Hayleigh (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 98 | 1,989 | |
2017 | 105 | 1,913 | |
2016 | 124 | 1,715 | |
2015 | 183 | 1,305 | |
2014 | 181 | 1,307 | |
2013 | 236 | 1,049 | |
2012 | 253 | 999 | |
2011 | 317 | 832 | |
2010 | 321 | 836 | |
2009 | 320 | 865 | |
2008 | 253 | 1,034 | |
2007 | 272 | 985 | |
2006 | 251 | 1,019 | |
2005 | 252 | 971 | |
2004 | 226 | 1,030 | |
2003 | 250 | 941 | |
2002 | 212 | 1,025 | |
2001 | 222 | 971 | |
2000 | 198 | 1,049 | |
1999 | 145 | 1,276 | |
1998 | 122 | 1,407 | |
1997 | 114 | 1,450 | |
1996 | 94 | 1,628 | |
1995 | 99 | 1,543 | |
1994 | 85 | 1,732 | |
1993 | 67 | 2,050 | |
1992 | 47 | 2,623 | |
1991 | 32 | 3,390 | |
1990 | 12 | 7,025 | |
1989 | 14 | 5,934 | |
1988 | 12 | 6,406 | |
1987 | 6 | 10,307 | |
1986 | 9 | 7,331 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |