Names of the Week
*
*
Word of the Week
 More

Glynn Name Popularity

    

Charts | Table | About | By Year

How popular is Glynn?

Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.

This once, top 1000 name, Glynn is currently less popular.

Its highest popularity ranking of #597 was reached in 1950 with 131 occurrences.

In any year, the least number of babies named Glynn was less than 5, most recently in 2018.

Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Glynn occurred roughly during the years 1910-1916, and 1917-1921, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1982-1985.

For a number of years, the name Glynn has been spiralling downward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Glynn for their newborn has dropped.

What does the future hold for the popularity of Glynn?

Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at an extremely low point.

The name Glynn is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.

Relative to what it once was, Glynn has fallen out of favor as a given name.

*Mouse over the charts or scroll down to the table for data details.

 
Mouse over or Click for Percentages.
   Glynn (Girl)Glynn (Boy)
Year %No. of Babies Given NamePopul. RankNo. of Babies Given NamePopul. Rank
2018 < 5 -- < 5 --
2017 < 5 -- < 5 --
2016 < 5 -- 5 12,834
2015 < 5 -- 5 12,692
2014 < 5 -- < 5 --
2013 < 5 -- 7 10,004
2012 < 5 -- 6 11,251
2011 < 5 -- < 5 --
2010 < 5 -- 6 11,206
2009 < 5 -- < 5 --
2008 < 5 -- < 5 --
2007 < 5 -- 5 13,004
2006 < 5 -- 5 12,688
2005 < 5 -- 9 7,855
2004 < 5 -- < 5 --
2003 < 5 -- 13 5,657
2002 < 5 -- 8 7,896
2001 < 5 -- 12 5,789
2000 < 5 -- 6 9,505
1999 < 5 -- 13 5,129
1998 < 5 -- 13 4,970
1997 < 5 -- 10 5,789
1996 < 5 -- 8 6,715
1995 < 5 -- 14 4,354
1994 7 10,952 14 4,382
1993 < 5 -- 11 5,135
1992 8 9,793 18 3,508
1991 5 13,910 21 3,040
1990 < 5 -- 20 3,099
1989 < 5 -- 15 3,690
1988 < 5 -- 22 2,639
1987 < 5 -- 28 2,140
1986 < 5 -- 22 2,453
1985 < 5 -- 14 3,274
1984 < 5 -- 27 2,000
1983 < 5 -- 22 2,303
1982 < 5 -- 33 1,746
1981 < 5 -- 33 1,743
1980 < 5 -- 36 1,634
1979 < 5 -- 31 1,802
1978 < 5 -- 22 2,149
1977 < 5 -- 41 1,433
1976 < 5 -- 24 2,018
1975 < 5 -- 42 1,349
1974 < 5 -- 31 1,602
1973 < 5 -- 28 1,668
1972 < 5 -- 32 1,520
1971 < 5 -- 36 1,426
1970 < 5 -- 55 1,104
1969 < 5 -- 45 1,176
1968 5 7,390 42 1,173
1967 7 5,662 49 1,050
1966 < 5 -- 49 1,047
1965 < 5 -- 51 1,037
1964 9 4,738 66 940
1963 5 6,972 78 855
1962 8 5,019 82 839
1961 5 6,919 94 786
1960 7 5,357 76 870
1959 < 5 -- 79 855
1958 6 5,656 98 746
1957 10 4,030 88 803
1956 8 4,590 97 747
1955 15 3,021 115 684
1954 16 2,815 111 684
1953 9 4,053 108 690
1952 8 4,254 103 689
1951 8 4,166 97 703
1950 10 3,517 131 597
1949 7 4,396 122 615
1948 13 2,877 109 652
1947 7 4,506 126 607
1946 7 4,155 94 669
1945 10 2,991 79 680
1944 5 4,822 75 719
1943 9 3,336 108 608
1942 8 3,545 84 702
1941 9 3,100 84 666
1940 9 3,055 79 682
1939 6 3,951 72 704
1938 13 2,380 62 781
1937 < 5 -- 67 745
1936 9 2,953 57 812
1935 5 4,480 74 705
1934 6 3,998 79 685
1933 5 4,477 60 792
1932 15 2,175 61 818
1931 < 5 -- 68 752
1930 10 2,933 67 787
1929 10 3,012 47 987
1928 9 3,289 73 756
1927 10 3,150 60 876
1926 6 4,519 58 881
1925 11 3,018 63 838
1924 5 5,394 49 1,008
1923 5 5,259 58 900
1922 5 5,318 42 1,091
1921 < 5 -- 54 955
1920 10 3,198 39 1,144
1919 5 5,106 31 1,277
1918 7 4,037 42 1,045
1917 6 4,292 35 1,141
1916 6 4,112 43 977
1915 8 3,250 30 1,194
1914 < 5 -- 34 955
1913 < 5 -- 24 1,035
1912 5 3,163 17 1,150
1911 < 5 -- 7 1,446
1910 < 5 -- 7 1,359
1909 < 5 -- 7 1,201
1908 < 5 -- < 5 --
1907 < 5 -- 5 1,415
1906 < 5 -- < 5 --
1905 < 5 -- < 5 --
1904 < 5 -- < 5 --
1903 < 5 -- < 5 --
1902 < 5 -- 6 1,062
1901 < 5 -- < 5 --
1900 < 5 -- < 5 --
1899 < 5 -- < 5 --
1898 < 5 -- < 5 --
1897 < 5 -- < 5 --
1896 < 5 -- < 5 --
1895 < 5 -- < 5 --
1894 < 5 -- < 5 --
1893 < 5 -- < 5 --
1892 < 5 -- < 5 --
1891 < 5 -- < 5 --
1890 < 5 -- < 5 --
1889 < 5 -- < 5 --
1888 < 5 -- < 5 --
1887 < 5 -- < 5 --
1886 < 5 -- < 5 --
1885 < 5 -- < 5 --
1884 < 5 -- < 5 --
1883 < 5 -- < 5 --
1882 < 5 -- < 5 --
1881 < 5 -- < 5 --
1880 < 5 -- < 5 --

United States name popularity data is provided by the Social Security Administration and is based on Social Security card applications.

Data for a given year is not made available until well into the next year.

Data reflects what was recorded and has not been edited for errors, so for example the gender associated with a name may be incorrect.

The more babies that are given a particular name, the higher the popularity ranking. If multiple names have the same usage, the tie is broken by assigning popularity rank in alphabetical order. Therefore in the case of names with fewer occurrences, names with the same number of occurrences may have vastly different rankings because they will be interranked alphabetically.

To safeguard privacy, the SSA does not include names with less than 5 occurrences.

Please note, we update the data each May when the SSA releases new figures. All data changes at that time, including previous years, which will change minutely based on new information.