Gisel Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Gisel?
In 2018 the rare name Gisel, ranked the 9,316th Most Popular Girls Name in the United States.Uncommon, Gisel would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1504 was reached in 1999 with 114 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Gisel was less than 5, most recently in 1972.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Gisel occurred roughly during the years 1985-1989, 1990-1993, and 1994-1998, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 2010-2017.
For a number of years, the name Gisel has been spiralling downward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Gisel for their newborn has dropped dramatically.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Gisel?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Gisel is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Gisel has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Gisel (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 11 | 9,316 | |
2017 | 25 | 5,214 | |
2016 | 22 | 5,848 | |
2015 | 20 | 6,300 | |
2014 | 52 | 3,149 | |
2013 | 48 | 3,330 | |
2012 | 39 | 3,937 | |
2011 | 63 | 2,773 | |
2010 | 80 | 2,366 | |
2009 | 89 | 2,211 | |
2008 | 93 | 2,161 | |
2007 | 105 | 1,960 | |
2006 | 107 | 1,896 | |
2005 | 113 | 1,744 | |
2004 | 110 | 1,751 | |
2003 | 111 | 1,714 | |
2002 | 105 | 1,735 | |
2001 | 91 | 1,909 | |
2000 | 102 | 1,720 | |
1999 | 114 | 1,504 | |
1998 | 104 | 1,581 | |
1997 | 75 | 1,936 | |
1996 | 27 | 3,976 | |
1995 | 51 | 2,499 | |
1994 | 42 | 2,855 | |
1993 | 47 | 2,609 | |
1992 | 26 | 4,002 | |
1991 | 14 | 6,358 | |
1990 | 30 | 3,552 | |
1989 | 27 | 3,710 | |
1988 | 17 | 4,913 | |
1987 | 13 | 5,700 | |
1986 | 18 | 4,419 | |
1985 | 8 | 7,805 | |
1984 | 15 | 4,800 | |
1983 | 12 | 5,561 | |
1982 | 13 | 5,316 | |
1981 | 12 | 5,669 | |
1980 | 14 | 5,060 | |
1979 | 5 | 10,719 | |
1978 | 18 | 3,962 | |
1977 | 15 | 4,489 | |
1976 | 8 | 6,826 | |
1975 | 15 | 4,215 | |
1974 | 6 | 8,024 | |
1973 | 9 | 5,715 | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 5 | 8,746 | |
1970 | 5 | 8,419 | |
1969 | 5 | 7,858 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |