Geanette Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Geanette?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Geanette would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #3542 was reached in 1957 with 12 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Geanette was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Geanette has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Geanette for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Geanette?
Geanette's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Geanette is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Geanette (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 6 | 8,473 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | 9 | 5,713 | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 5 | 7,123 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 7 | 5,646 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | 6 | 6,100 | |
1961 | 10 | 4,348 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | 5 | 6,575 | |
1958 | 6 | 5,640 | |
1957 | 12 | 3,542 | |
1956 | 6 | 5,508 | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | 6 | 5,258 | |
1952 | 7 | 4,627 | |
1951 | 5 | 5,690 | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | 5 | 4,807 | |
1943 | 5 | 4,917 | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 6 | 3,936 | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | 5 | 4,482 | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | 5 | 4,802 | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |