Eyal Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Eyal?
The rare name Eyal was the 7,719th Most Popular Boys Name in the United States in 2018.Eyal, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #3688 was reached in 1977.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2010 with 21 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Eyal in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2000.
Approximately during the years 2006-2010 the name Eyal took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Where is the name Eyal popularity headed?
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
For a number of years, the name Eyal has been moving upward in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Eyal has dropped.
The name Eyal is mostly unused and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
Eyal (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 10 | 7,719 | |
2017 | 18 | 5,147 | |
2016 | 17 | 5,364 | |
2015 | 13 | 6,429 | |
2014 | 18 | 5,111 | |
2013 | 14 | 6,008 | |
2012 | 17 | 5,314 | |
2011 | 21 | 4,547 | |
2010 | 21 | 4,565 | |
2009 | 18 | 5,160 | |
2008 | 12 | 6,880 | |
2007 | 13 | 6,371 | |
2006 | 10 | 7,599 | |
2005 | 12 | 6,344 | |
2004 | 13 | 5,907 | |
2003 | 5 | 11,433 | |
2002 | 9 | 7,215 | |
2001 | 9 | 7,092 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | 6 | 8,823 | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | 8 | 6,699 | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | 5 | 9,270 | |
1993 | 6 | 7,958 | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | 9 | 5,654 | |
1990 | 7 | 6,644 | |
1989 | 5 | 8,302 | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | 8 | 5,109 | |
1986 | 6 | 6,187 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | 6 | 5,816 | |
1983 | 5 | 6,572 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 8 | 4,658 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | 6 | 5,579 | |
1978 | 8 | 4,276 | |
1977 | 10 | 3,688 | |
1976 | 8 | 4,134 | |
1975 | 6 | 5,017 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | 7 | 3,710 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |