Duan Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Duan?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Duan would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1946 was reached in 1976 with 25 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Duan was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Duan occurred roughly during the years 1968-1974, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1976-1979.
For a number of years, the name Duan has been moving downward in popularity. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Duan for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Duan?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Duan is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Duan (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 8 | 8,989 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 5 | 12,987 | |
2008 | 8 | 9,213 | |
2007 | 9 | 8,366 | |
2006 | 6 | 11,029 | |
2005 | 6 | 10,460 | |
2004 | 5 | 11,849 | |
2003 | 8 | 8,051 | |
2002 | 6 | 9,715 | |
2001 | 12 | 5,768 | |
2000 | 8 | 7,638 | |
1999 | 10 | 6,166 | |
1998 | 7 | 7,816 | |
1997 | 7 | 7,513 | |
1996 | 7 | 7,354 | |
1995 | 11 | 5,234 | |
1994 | 7 | 7,186 | |
1993 | 11 | 5,109 | |
1992 | 13 | 4,395 | |
1991 | 14 | 4,065 | |
1990 | 16 | 3,652 | |
1989 | 10 | 4,920 | |
1988 | 18 | 2,996 | |
1987 | 14 | 3,387 | |
1986 | 13 | 3,500 | |
1985 | 16 | 2,985 | |
1984 | 17 | 2,727 | |
1983 | 13 | 3,288 | |
1982 | 7 | 5,175 | |
1981 | 17 | 2,704 | |
1980 | 7 | 5,087 | |
1979 | 10 | 3,882 | |
1978 | 19 | 2,403 | |
1977 | 16 | 2,689 | |
1976 | 25 | 1,946 | |
1975 | 17 | 2,472 | |
1974 | 22 | 2,006 | |
1973 | 11 | 3,069 | |
1972 | 13 | 2,710 | |
1971 | 10 | 3,206 | |
1970 | 10 | 3,127 | |
1969 | 10 | 2,918 | |
1968 | 8 | 3,179 | |
1967 | 11 | 2,517 | |
1966 | 12 | 2,367 | |
1965 | 11 | 2,510 | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | 7 | 3,410 | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | 7 | 3,444 | |
1960 | 6 | 3,773 | |
1959 | 5 | 4,150 | |
1958 | 5 | 4,099 | |
1957 | 6 | 3,669 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | 9 | 2,766 | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |