What's New
Fact of the Week
Doroteo Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Doroteo?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Doroteo would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #1,576 in 1929 with 22 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Doroteo in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Doroteo's popularity has been moving downward for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Doroteo has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Doroteo?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a very low point.
The name Doroteo is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Doroteo (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 5 | 12,540 | |
2014 | 7 | 9,900 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 7 | 10,131 | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 6 | 10,315 | |
2003 | 6 | 9,917 | |
2002 | 6 | 9,708 | |
2001 | 5 | 11,042 | |
2000 | 7 | 8,447 | |
1999 | 5 | 10,357 | |
1998 | 6 | 8,785 | |
1997 | 10 | 5,761 | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | 7 | 7,210 | |
1994 | 9 | 5,993 | |
1993 | 5 | 9,141 | |
1992 | 5 | 8,794 | |
1991 | 7 | 6,719 | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 9 | 4,901 | |
1987 | 9 | 4,661 | |
1986 | 5 | 7,017 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | 5 | 6,592 | |
1983 | 7 | 5,063 | |
1982 | 9 | 4,326 | |
1981 | 9 | 4,249 | |
1980 | 5 | 6,524 | |
1979 | 6 | 5,549 | |
1978 | 8 | 4,258 | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 11 | 3,327 | |
1975 | 5 | 5,702 | |
1974 | 14 | 2,705 | |
1973 | 6 | 4,657 | |
1972 | 8 | 3,718 | |
1971 | 6 | 4,545 | |
1970 | 8 | 3,597 | |
1969 | 7 | 3,693 | |
1968 | 6 | 3,811 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | 5 | 4,095 | |
1965 | 8 | 3,049 | |
1964 | 8 | 3,109 | |
1963 | 8 | 3,124 | |
1962 | 8 | 3,115 | |
1961 | 8 | 3,164 | |
1960 | 8 | 3,154 | |
1959 | 6 | 3,706 | |
1958 | 8 | 3,093 | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | 8 | 3,028 | |
1955 | 5 | 4,009 | |
1954 | 10 | 2,632 | |
1953 | 12 | 2,314 | |
1952 | 10 | 2,567 | |
1951 | 5 | 3,852 | |
1950 | 8 | 2,832 | |
1949 | 12 | 2,253 | |
1948 | 8 | 2,842 | |
1947 | 13 | 2,187 | |
1946 | 12 | 2,183 | |
1945 | 13 | 1,950 | |
1944 | 11 | 2,226 | |
1943 | 7 | 3,025 | |
1942 | 8 | 2,764 | |
1941 | 12 | 2,112 | |
1940 | 10 | 2,366 | |
1939 | 10 | 2,321 | |
1938 | 7 | 2,943 | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | 5 | 3,681 | |
1935 | 10 | 2,428 | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | 9 | 2,687 | |
1931 | 7 | 3,178 | |
1930 | 9 | 2,827 | |
1929 | 22 | 1,576 | |
1928 | 8 | 3,154 | |
1927 | 9 | 2,968 | |
1926 | 7 | 3,472 | |
1925 | 8 | 3,211 | |
1924 | 10 | 2,865 | |
1923 | 13 | 2,360 | |
1922 | 12 | 2,523 | |
1921 | 6 | 3,980 | |
1920 | 5 | 4,467 | |
1919 | 10 | 2,723 | |
1918 | 5 | 4,336 | |
1917 | 6 | 3,656 | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | 8 | 2,885 | |
1914 | 8 | 2,495 | |
1913 | 5 | 2,935 | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |