Diannah Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Diannah?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Diannah would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #3273 was reached in 1950 with 11 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Diannah was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Diannah has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Diannah for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Diannah?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a mid point.
The name Diannah is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Diannah (Girl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | 5 | 16,455 |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | 5 | 14,054 |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1989 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | 5 | 9,443 |
| 1974 | | 5 | 9,116 |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | 5 | 8,599 |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | 5 | 8,302 |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | 5 | 6,596 |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | 7 | 5,025 |
| 1956 | | 5 | 6,184 |
| 1955 | | 6 | 5,352 |
| 1954 | | 6 | 5,288 |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | 11 | 3,273 |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | 5 | 5,444 |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | 5 | 5,124 |
| 1945 | | 6 | 4,152 |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |