Derrill Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Derrill?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Derrill would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #1,457 in 1945.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1950 with 23 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Derrill in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Derrill, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1922-1925, 1936-1941, and 1953-1957.
Derrill's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Derrill has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Derrill?
Derrill's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Derrill is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Derrill (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 6 | 7,687 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 5 | 8,445 | |
1989 | 9 | 5,276 | |
1988 | 11 | 4,243 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | 7 | 5,473 | |
1985 | 8 | 4,808 | |
1984 | 7 | 5,106 | |
1983 | 5 | 6,479 | |
1982 | 8 | 4,698 | |
1981 | 6 | 5,674 | |
1980 | 6 | 5,698 | |
1979 | 5 | 6,290 | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 6 | 5,299 | |
1976 | 6 | 5,083 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | 13 | 2,749 | |
1972 | 6 | 4,571 | |
1971 | 12 | 2,851 | |
1970 | 5 | 4,887 | |
1969 | 13 | 2,448 | |
1968 | 11 | 2,608 | |
1967 | 6 | 3,648 | |
1966 | 14 | 2,162 | |
1965 | 13 | 2,293 | |
1964 | 11 | 2,572 | |
1963 | 12 | 2,446 | |
1962 | 13 | 2,299 | |
1961 | 12 | 2,440 | |
1960 | 14 | 2,234 | |
1959 | 10 | 2,692 | |
1958 | 15 | 2,116 | |
1957 | 21 | 1,768 | |
1956 | 11 | 2,533 | |
1955 | 10 | 2,629 | |
1954 | 15 | 2,057 | |
1953 | 11 | 2,425 | |
1952 | 12 | 2,281 | |
1951 | 15 | 1,998 | |
1950 | 23 | 1,548 | |
1949 | 9 | 2,659 | |
1948 | 15 | 1,963 | |
1947 | 12 | 2,271 | |
1946 | 11 | 2,307 | |
1945 | 21 | 1,457 | |
1944 | 8 | 2,685 | |
1943 | 16 | 1,854 | |
1942 | 21 | 1,548 | |
1941 | 20 | 1,545 | |
1940 | 13 | 2,009 | |
1939 | 16 | 1,739 | |
1938 | 13 | 2,009 | |
1937 | 11 | 2,235 | |
1936 | 11 | 2,211 | |
1935 | 14 | 1,953 | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | 10 | 2,408 | |
1932 | 15 | 1,936 | |
1931 | 7 | 3,171 | |
1930 | 9 | 2,823 | |
1929 | 6 | 3,655 | |
1928 | 10 | 2,705 | |
1927 | 10 | 2,747 | |
1926 | 6 | 3,816 | |
1925 | 15 | 2,112 | |
1924 | 10 | 2,857 | |
1923 | 11 | 2,659 | |
1922 | 9 | 3,073 | |
1921 | 13 | 2,408 | |
1920 | 8 | 3,281 | |
1919 | 5 | 4,312 | |
1918 | 13 | 2,287 | |
1917 | 7 | 3,303 | |
1916 | 10 | 2,593 | |
1915 | 9 | 2,677 | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |