Daphna Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Daphna?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Daphna would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1750 was reached in 1916 with 20 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Daphna was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1913-1916, the name Daphna took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1919-1922.
For a number of years, the name Daphna has been moving downward in popularity. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Daphna for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Daphna?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Daphna is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Daphna (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 9 | 11,191 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | 7 | 13,811 | |
2009 | 7 | 14,053 | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | 6 | 15,981 | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | 8 | 12,099 | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | 6 | 14,297 | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | 6 | 12,843 | |
1997 | 5 | 14,258 | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 6 | 11,745 | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 5 | 12,236 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | 7 | 8,551 | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 7 | 8,229 | |
1982 | 6 | 9,498 | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | 5 | 10,550 | |
1978 | 6 | 8,784 | |
1977 | 7 | 7,719 | |
1976 | 5 | 9,613 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | 6 | 7,904 | |
1973 | 5 | 8,700 | |
1972 | 7 | 6,698 | |
1971 | 6 | 7,575 | |
1970 | 5 | 8,239 | |
1969 | 5 | 7,691 | |
1968 | 10 | 4,551 | |
1967 | 9 | 4,680 | |
1966 | 10 | 4,244 | |
1965 | 5 | 6,718 | |
1964 | 12 | 3,922 | |
1963 | 15 | 3,365 | |
1962 | 13 | 3,625 | |
1961 | 9 | 4,607 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | 7 | 5,132 | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | 5 | 5,907 | |
1953 | 8 | 4,307 | |
1952 | 5 | 5,731 | |
1951 | 5 | 5,582 | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | 10 | 3,398 | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | 5 | 5,100 | |
1945 | 6 | 4,134 | |
1944 | 7 | 3,767 | |
1943 | 10 | 3,084 | |
1942 | 8 | 3,501 | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | 9 | 3,006 | |
1939 | 7 | 3,508 | |
1938 | 7 | 3,530 | |
1937 | 7 | 3,518 | |
1936 | 8 | 3,162 | |
1935 | 9 | 2,974 | |
1934 | 13 | 2,317 | |
1933 | 10 | 2,724 | |
1932 | 12 | 2,528 | |
1931 | 9 | 3,027 | |
1930 | 11 | 2,724 | |
1929 | 12 | 2,612 | |
1928 | 8 | 3,492 | |
1927 | 17 | 2,190 | |
1926 | 19 | 2,017 | |
1925 | 19 | 2,048 | |
1924 | 9 | 3,457 | |
1923 | 6 | 4,502 | |
1922 | 10 | 3,205 | |
1921 | 15 | 2,403 | |
1920 | 17 | 2,189 | |
1919 | 16 | 2,174 | |
1918 | 18 | 2,048 | |
1917 | 15 | 2,224 | |
1916 | 20 | 1,750 | |
1915 | 10 | 2,741 | |
1914 | 12 | 2,040 | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | 7 | 1,978 | |
1909 | 7 | 1,805 | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |