Daphene Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Daphene?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Daphene would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #2212 was reached in 1934.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1964 with 22 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Daphene was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Daphene has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Daphene for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Daphene?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Daphene is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Daphene (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | 6 | 12,136 | |
1992 | 5 | 13,784 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | 5 | 11,705 | |
1986 | 5 | 11,341 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 5 | 10,771 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 5 | 9,612 | |
1975 | 11 | 5,224 | |
1974 | 7 | 7,040 | |
1973 | 10 | 5,258 | |
1972 | 20 | 3,191 | |
1971 | 20 | 3,283 | |
1970 | 9 | 5,480 | |
1969 | 13 | 4,000 | |
1968 | 16 | 3,348 | |
1967 | 8 | 5,072 | |
1966 | 15 | 3,286 | |
1965 | 11 | 3,995 | |
1964 | 22 | 2,689 | |
1963 | 17 | 3,086 | |
1962 | 21 | 2,676 | |
1961 | 14 | 3,483 | |
1960 | 8 | 4,842 | |
1959 | 8 | 4,708 | |
1958 | 9 | 4,237 | |
1957 | 8 | 4,606 | |
1956 | 7 | 4,927 | |
1955 | 14 | 3,125 | |
1954 | 8 | 4,355 | |
1953 | 9 | 4,001 | |
1952 | 5 | 5,730 | |
1951 | 6 | 4,958 | |
1950 | 7 | 4,405 | |
1949 | 7 | 4,320 | |
1948 | 5 | 5,407 | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | 7 | 4,075 | |
1945 | 9 | 3,191 | |
1944 | 5 | 4,704 | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | 9 | 3,005 | |
1939 | 5 | 4,382 | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | 8 | 3,202 | |
1936 | 9 | 2,907 | |
1935 | 9 | 2,973 | |
1934 | 14 | 2,212 | |
1933 | 13 | 2,292 | |
1932 | 7 | 3,648 | |
1931 | 7 | 3,557 | |
1930 | 8 | 3,409 | |
1929 | 14 | 2,335 | |
1928 | 15 | 2,305 | |
1927 | 12 | 2,736 | |
1926 | 9 | 3,312 | |
1925 | 8 | 3,751 | |
1924 | 11 | 3,009 | |
1923 | 11 | 2,961 | |
1922 | 10 | 3,204 | |
1921 | 8 | 3,745 | |
1920 | 10 | 3,155 | |
1919 | 9 | 3,265 | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | 5 | 4,576 | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |