Dajuana Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Dajuana?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Dajuana would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #4562 was reached in 1965.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1988 with 13 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Dajuana in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Dajuana has been moving downward in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Dajuana has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Dajuana?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Dajuana is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Dajuana (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | 5 | 16,003 | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 6 | 13,559 | |
1999 | 9 | 9,675 | |
1998 | 5 | 14,673 | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | 7 | 10,828 | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 5 | 13,763 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | 8 | 8,928 | |
1988 | 13 | 5,974 | |
1987 | 6 | 10,116 | |
1986 | 6 | 9,808 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 7 | 8,299 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 5 | 9,595 | |
1975 | 7 | 7,317 | |
1974 | 8 | 6,363 | |
1973 | 7 | 6,808 | |
1972 | 6 | 7,470 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | 7 | 6,076 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 6 | 6,160 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 9 | 4,562 | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |