Daesha Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Daesha?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Daesha would be a striking name choice.
Position 2349, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1996 with 56 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Daesha was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1986-1989, and 1991-1996, the name Daesha took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas 2004-2007 were years of successive downward movement.
The popularity trend for Daesha has been spiralling downward for a while. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Daesha lately has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Daesha?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Daesha is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Daesha has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Daesha (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 7 | 13,375 | |
2013 | 12 | 9,147 | |
2012 | 6 | 15,389 | |
2011 | 9 | 11,387 | |
2010 | 9 | 11,463 | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 15 | 8,204 | |
2007 | 11 | 10,286 | |
2006 | 27 | 5,118 | |
2005 | 23 | 5,483 | |
2004 | 26 | 4,963 | |
2003 | 28 | 4,571 | |
2002 | 51 | 2,901 | |
2001 | 29 | 4,235 | |
2000 | 52 | 2,786 | |
1999 | 48 | 2,819 | |
1998 | 36 | 3,363 | |
1997 | 46 | 2,706 | |
1996 | 56 | 2,349 | |
1995 | 43 | 2,797 | |
1994 | 21 | 4,718 | |
1993 | 12 | 7,122 | |
1992 | 15 | 6,079 | |
1991 | 8 | 9,531 | |
1990 | 14 | 6,197 | |
1989 | 13 | 6,233 | |
1988 | 11 | 6,743 | |
1987 | 10 | 6,903 | |
1986 | 9 | 7,244 | |
1985 | 8 | 7,728 | |
1984 | 8 | 7,527 | |
1983 | 6 | 9,283 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 5 | 10,751 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |