Carleigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Carleigh?
Ranking 1,386th in popularity in the United States for girls in 2018, the name Carleigh is uncommon.Although not currently within the top 1000, Carleigh has seen higher popularity rankings.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #927 in 2010 with 279 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Carleigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1977.
Approximately during the years 1985-2000, and 2001-2004 the name Carleigh took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Carleigh be?
Carleigh's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Carleigh has dropped.
The name Carleigh is still rare and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
Carleigh (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 161 | 1,386 | |
2017 | 178 | 1,307 | |
2016 | 203 | 1,211 | |
2015 | 236 | 1,095 | |
2014 | 235 | 1,085 | |
2013 | 230 | 1,073 | |
2012 | 265 | 959 | |
2011 | 266 | 959 | |
2010 | 279 | 927 | |
2009 | 258 | 1,016 | |
2008 | 265 | 997 | |
2007 | 243 | 1,081 | |
2006 | 238 | 1,068 | |
2005 | 191 | 1,197 | |
2004 | 203 | 1,123 | |
2003 | 192 | 1,135 | |
2002 | 165 | 1,218 | |
2001 | 155 | 1,267 | |
2000 | 188 | 1,094 | |
1999 | 139 | 1,304 | |
1998 | 151 | 1,214 | |
1997 | 135 | 1,290 | |
1996 | 105 | 1,519 | |
1995 | 112 | 1,440 | |
1994 | 93 | 1,625 | |
1993 | 92 | 1,641 | |
1992 | 87 | 1,716 | |
1991 | 74 | 1,899 | |
1990 | 59 | 2,180 | |
1989 | 42 | 2,665 | |
1988 | 35 | 2,935 | |
1987 | 24 | 3,635 | |
1986 | 26 | 3,368 | |
1985 | 16 | 4,656 | |
1984 | 22 | 3,625 | |
1983 | 18 | 4,132 | |
1982 | 20 | 3,911 | |
1981 | 9 | 6,869 | |
1980 | 9 | 6,864 | |
1979 | 9 | 6,764 | |
1978 | 8 | 7,031 | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 5 | 9,245 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |