Calleigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Calleigh?
Ranking 2,738th in popularity in the United States for girls in 2018, the name Calleigh is rare.Although not currently within the top 1000, Calleigh has seen higher popularity rankings.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #833 in 2009 with 335 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Calleigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1990.
Approximately during the years 2000-2009, the name Calleigh took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 2009-2016.
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Calleigh be?
Calleigh's popularity has been soaring upward for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Calleigh has dropped.
The name Calleigh is quite distinctive and has recently started to drift downward in popularity.
Calleigh (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 62 | 2,738 | |
2017 | 95 | 2,049 | |
2016 | 71 | 2,517 | |
2015 | 80 | 2,324 | |
2014 | 106 | 1,891 | |
2013 | 105 | 1,906 | |
2012 | 124 | 1,689 | |
2011 | 133 | 1,620 | |
2010 | 175 | 1,342 | |
2009 | 335 | 833 | |
2008 | 212 | 1,200 | |
2007 | 181 | 1,341 | |
2006 | 88 | 2,189 | |
2005 | 75 | 2,360 | |
2004 | 32 | 4,299 | |
2003 | 36 | 3,809 | |
2002 | 9 | 10,376 | |
2001 | 10 | 9,485 | |
2000 | 18 | 5,983 | |
1999 | 23 | 4,745 | |
1998 | 11 | 8,089 | |
1997 | 7 | 11,043 | |
1996 | 9 | 8,922 | |
1995 | 12 | 7,125 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,228 | |
1993 | 7 | 10,781 | |
1992 | 7 | 10,642 | |
1991 | 10 | 8,055 | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |