Caileigh Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Caileigh?
Ranking 3,916th in popularity in the United States for girls in 2018, the name Caileigh is rare.Caileigh, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #2,850 in 2001.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2008 with 62 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Caileigh in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1987.
Approximately during the years 1987-1990, 1991-1995, and 1996-1999 the name Caileigh took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Currently, the name is at a mid point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Caileigh be?
Caileigh's popularity has been moving upward for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Caileigh has risen.
The name Caileigh is very unique but will probably continue to rise upward in popularity.
Caileigh (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 37 | 3,916 | |
2017 | 38 | 3,922 | |
2016 | 40 | 3,782 | |
2015 | 47 | 3,393 | |
2014 | 29 | 4,790 | |
2013 | 30 | 4,665 | |
2012 | 44 | 3,592 | |
2011 | 55 | 3,058 | |
2010 | 57 | 2,981 | |
2009 | 55 | 3,092 | |
2008 | 62 | 2,859 | |
2007 | 45 | 3,606 | |
2006 | 37 | 4,011 | |
2005 | 44 | 3,414 | |
2004 | 41 | 3,572 | |
2003 | 33 | 4,045 | |
2002 | 31 | 4,088 | |
2001 | 51 | 2,850 | |
2000 | 38 | 3,463 | |
1999 | 43 | 3,055 | |
1998 | 21 | 4,984 | |
1997 | 24 | 4,398 | |
1996 | 15 | 6,099 | |
1995 | 31 | 3,505 | |
1994 | 25 | 4,136 | |
1993 | 23 | 4,410 | |
1992 | 20 | 4,870 | |
1991 | 8 | 9,448 | |
1990 | 12 | 6,923 | |
1989 | 10 | 7,519 | |
1988 | 8 | 8,494 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |