Aracelis Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Aracelis?
In 2018 the rare name Aracelis, ranked the 11,441st Most Popular Girls Name in the United States.Uncommon, Aracelis would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #2064 was reached in 1960.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1980 with 35 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Aracelis in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2017.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Aracelis occurred roughly during the years 1956-1960, 1975-1980, and 1994-2001.
For a number of years, the name Aracelis has steadily decreased in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Aracelis has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Aracelis?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Aracelis is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Aracelis (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 8 | 11,441 | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 11 | 9,461 | |
2015 | 7 | 13,124 | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | 13 | 8,613 | |
2012 | 6 | 15,142 | |
2011 | 11 | 9,783 | |
2010 | 9 | 11,345 | |
2009 | 11 | 10,044 | |
2008 | 16 | 7,776 | |
2007 | 21 | 6,341 | |
2006 | 12 | 9,350 | |
2005 | 18 | 6,554 | |
2004 | 19 | 6,248 | |
2003 | 14 | 7,616 | |
2002 | 13 | 7,869 | |
2001 | 27 | 4,454 | |
2000 | 10 | 9,230 | |
1999 | 15 | 6,516 | |
1998 | 20 | 5,145 | |
1997 | 12 | 7,320 | |
1996 | 11 | 7,628 | |
1995 | 13 | 6,671 | |
1994 | 10 | 8,178 | |
1993 | 17 | 5,436 | |
1992 | 21 | 4,695 | |
1991 | 27 | 3,823 | |
1990 | 14 | 6,148 | |
1989 | 12 | 6,565 | |
1988 | 13 | 5,918 | |
1987 | 20 | 4,133 | |
1986 | 19 | 4,200 | |
1985 | 17 | 4,464 | |
1984 | 19 | 4,004 | |
1983 | 24 | 3,342 | |
1982 | 15 | 4,732 | |
1981 | 33 | 2,727 | |
1980 | 35 | 2,654 | |
1979 | 18 | 4,056 | |
1978 | 27 | 2,942 | |
1977 | 20 | 3,614 | |
1976 | 11 | 5,235 | |
1975 | 21 | 3,272 | |
1974 | 22 | 3,109 | |
1973 | 23 | 2,919 | |
1972 | 17 | 3,552 | |
1971 | 34 | 2,295 | |
1970 | 27 | 2,650 | |
1969 | 16 | 3,466 | |
1968 | 17 | 3,175 | |
1967 | 14 | 3,495 | |
1966 | 20 | 2,757 | |
1965 | 17 | 3,056 | |
1964 | 18 | 3,002 | |
1963 | 19 | 2,866 | |
1962 | 14 | 3,441 | |
1961 | 20 | 2,757 | |
1960 | 31 | 2,064 | |
1959 | 14 | 3,266 | |
1958 | 19 | 2,668 | |
1957 | 12 | 3,495 | |
1956 | 7 | 4,853 | |
1955 | 8 | 4,389 | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |