Anselma Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Anselma?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Anselma would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2519 was reached in 1924 with 14 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Anselma was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Anselma has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Anselma for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Anselma?
Anselma's popularity is at a low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Anselma is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Anselma (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | 5 | 14,577 | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 5 | 10,360 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | 5 | 10,513 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | 5 | 6,639 | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | 6 | 5,732 | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | 5 | 5,441 | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | 6 | 4,694 | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | 7 | 3,580 | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 5 | 4,277 | |
1938 | 5 | 4,367 | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | 6 | 3,717 | |
1935 | 7 | 3,441 | |
1934 | 8 | 3,174 | |
1933 | 8 | 3,119 | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | 6 | 4,063 | |
1929 | 5 | 4,603 | |
1928 | 5 | 4,754 | |
1927 | 8 | 3,573 | |
1926 | 10 | 3,056 | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | 14 | 2,519 | |
1923 | 8 | 3,658 | |
1922 | 11 | 2,963 | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | 8 | 3,625 | |
1919 | 9 | 3,231 | |
1918 | 6 | 4,313 | |
1917 | 7 | 3,736 | |
1916 | 9 | 3,051 | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |