Anabell Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Anabell?
In 2018 the rare name Anabell, ranked the 9,138th Most Popular Girls Name in the United States.Uncommon, Anabell would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2030 was reached in 2013 with 95 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Anabell was less than 5, most recently in 1979.
Anabell, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1987-1990, 1995-1999, and 2000-2008, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 2014-2017.
For a number of years, the name Anabell has steadily decreased in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Anabell for their newborn has dropped dramatically.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Anabell?
Anabell's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Anabell is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Anabell (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 11 | 9,138 | |
2017 | 24 | 5,344 | |
2016 | 31 | 4,528 | |
2015 | 38 | 3,913 | |
2014 | 86 | 2,190 | |
2013 | 95 | 2,030 | |
2012 | 79 | 2,353 | |
2011 | 83 | 2,256 | |
2010 | 80 | 2,361 | |
2009 | 74 | 2,531 | |
2008 | 71 | 2,611 | |
2007 | 47 | 3,485 | |
2006 | 44 | 3,566 | |
2005 | 47 | 3,266 | |
2004 | 30 | 4,500 | |
2003 | 31 | 4,223 | |
2002 | 36 | 3,658 | |
2001 | 18 | 6,087 | |
2000 | 25 | 4,659 | |
1999 | 29 | 3,974 | |
1998 | 25 | 4,374 | |
1997 | 15 | 6,184 | |
1996 | 17 | 5,542 | |
1995 | 12 | 7,070 | |
1994 | 11 | 7,640 | |
1993 | 11 | 7,522 | |
1992 | 10 | 8,096 | |
1991 | 16 | 5,669 | |
1990 | 21 | 4,528 | |
1989 | 18 | 4,860 | |
1988 | 10 | 7,139 | |
1987 | 8 | 8,023 | |
1986 | 14 | 5,196 | |
1985 | 14 | 5,089 | |
1984 | 11 | 5,917 | |
1983 | 17 | 4,289 | |
1982 | 5 | 10,563 | |
1981 | 13 | 5,262 | |
1980 | 21 | 3,722 | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | 5 | 9,817 | |
1977 | 14 | 4,664 | |
1976 | 9 | 6,061 | |
1975 | 5 | 9,128 | |
1974 | 9 | 5,788 | |
1973 | 9 | 5,588 | |
1972 | 5 | 8,329 | |
1971 | 8 | 6,021 | |
1970 | 9 | 5,418 | |
1969 | 10 | 4,729 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 6 | 6,055 | |
1966 | 8 | 4,872 | |
1965 | 8 | 4,836 | |
1964 | 8 | 5,014 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | 6 | 5,867 | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | 5 | 5,048 | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |