Ambur Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ambur?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Ambur would be a striking name choice.
Position 3048, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1989 with 35 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Ambur in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1981-1989, the name Ambur took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 1989-1992.
The popularity trend for Ambur has been spiralling downward for a while. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Ambur has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Ambur?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Ambur is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Ambur (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 8 | 12,498 | |
2005 | 6 | 14,618 | |
2004 | 8 | 11,689 | |
2003 | 7 | 12,496 | |
2002 | 8 | 11,171 | |
2001 | 10 | 9,399 | |
2000 | 5 | 15,176 | |
1999 | 9 | 9,527 | |
1998 | 15 | 6,387 | |
1997 | 21 | 4,828 | |
1996 | 18 | 5,295 | |
1995 | 17 | 5,453 | |
1994 | 17 | 5,457 | |
1993 | 27 | 3,882 | |
1992 | 19 | 5,063 | |
1991 | 26 | 3,940 | |
1990 | 26 | 3,914 | |
1989 | 35 | 3,048 | |
1988 | 25 | 3,694 | |
1987 | 23 | 3,747 | |
1986 | 23 | 3,653 | |
1985 | 20 | 3,985 | |
1984 | 16 | 4,483 | |
1983 | 14 | 4,893 | |
1982 | 12 | 5,545 | |
1981 | 11 | 5,902 | |
1980 | 14 | 4,981 | |
1979 | 11 | 5,761 | |
1978 | 15 | 4,464 | |
1977 | 12 | 5,217 | |
1976 | 5 | 9,324 | |
1975 | 7 | 7,192 | |
1974 | 5 | 8,816 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |