Alanson Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Alanson?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Alanson would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2410 was reached in 1927 with 12 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Alanson was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Alanson has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Alanson for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Alanson?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Alanson is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Alanson (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | 5 | 8,726 | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | 5 | 6,738 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 5 | 5,862 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | 5 | 3,994 | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | 6 | 3,508 | |
1954 | 7 | 3,179 | |
1953 | 5 | 3,810 | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | 9 | 2,665 | |
1950 | 5 | 3,696 | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | 5 | 3,678 | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | 8 | 2,692 | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | 5 | 3,435 | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | 6 | 3,133 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | 6 | 3,564 | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | 12 | 2,410 | |
1926 | 5 | 4,210 | |
1925 | 7 | 3,420 | |
1924 | 7 | 3,507 | |
1923 | 8 | 3,179 | |
1922 | 10 | 2,800 | |
1921 | 7 | 3,525 | |
1920 | 6 | 3,819 | |
1919 | 6 | 3,739 | |
1918 | 8 | 3,100 | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | 7 | 3,180 | |
1915 | 9 | 2,622 | |
1914 | 6 | 2,920 | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | 5 | 2,549 | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |