Adelfa Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Adelfa?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Adelfa would be a striking name choice.
Position 2237, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1945.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1946 with 16 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Adelfa in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
The popularity trend for Adelfa has remained mostly unchanged for a while. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Adelfa has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Adelfa?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Adelfa is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Adelfa (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | 5 | 8,778 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 5 | 8,330 | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | 5 | 6,565 | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 9 | 4,635 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | 5 | 6,391 | |
1959 | 6 | 5,574 | |
1958 | 7 | 4,886 | |
1957 | 6 | 5,377 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | 6 | 5,042 | |
1952 | 5 | 5,567 | |
1951 | 6 | 4,835 | |
1950 | 7 | 4,321 | |
1949 | 7 | 4,238 | |
1948 | 9 | 3,593 | |
1947 | 11 | 3,242 | |
1946 | 16 | 2,392 | |
1945 | 15 | 2,237 | |
1944 | 7 | 3,688 | |
1943 | 7 | 3,801 | |
1942 | 11 | 2,817 | |
1941 | 6 | 3,956 | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 11 | 2,592 | |
1938 | 8 | 3,181 | |
1937 | 8 | 3,145 | |
1936 | 6 | 3,701 | |
1935 | 10 | 2,731 | |
1934 | 8 | 3,161 | |
1933 | 7 | 3,406 | |
1932 | 7 | 3,570 | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | 5 | 4,552 | |
1929 | 10 | 2,921 | |
1928 | 11 | 2,768 | |
1927 | 12 | 2,699 | |
1926 | 11 | 2,873 | |
1925 | 5 | 4,975 | |
1924 | 11 | 2,972 | |
1923 | 10 | 3,128 | |
1922 | 9 | 3,379 | |
1921 | 10 | 3,165 | |
1920 | 8 | 3,599 | |
1919 | 7 | 3,820 | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | 10 | 2,834 | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |