Shannell Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shannell?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Shannell would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #3246 was reached in 1987 with 29 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Shannell was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Shannell, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1975-1979, and 1983-1987, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1990-1993.
For a number of years, the name Shannell has steadily decreased in popularity. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Shannell for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shannell?
Shannell's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shannell is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Shannell (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 5 | 18,774 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | 6 | 16,458 | |
2010 | 5 | 19,377 | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 5 | 19,992 | |
2007 | 8 | 13,728 | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | 6 | 16,118 | |
2004 | 6 | 15,756 | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 6 | 15,028 | |
2000 | 8 | 11,610 | |
1999 | 7 | 12,458 | |
1998 | 8 | 10,969 | |
1997 | 8 | 10,649 | |
1996 | 12 | 7,500 | |
1995 | 13 | 6,963 | |
1994 | 8 | 10,364 | |
1993 | 12 | 7,405 | |
1992 | 14 | 6,594 | |
1991 | 18 | 5,361 | |
1990 | 29 | 3,692 | |
1989 | 21 | 4,496 | |
1988 | 23 | 3,996 | |
1987 | 29 | 3,246 | |
1986 | 12 | 6,081 | |
1985 | 22 | 3,822 | |
1984 | 18 | 4,294 | |
1983 | 10 | 6,619 | |
1982 | 20 | 4,005 | |
1981 | 16 | 4,694 | |
1980 | 15 | 4,931 | |
1979 | 20 | 3,880 | |
1978 | 14 | 4,877 | |
1977 | 15 | 4,606 | |
1976 | 13 | 4,850 | |
1975 | 10 | 5,897 | |
1974 | 13 | 4,667 | |
1973 | 11 | 5,138 | |
1972 | 9 | 5,844 | |
1971 | 7 | 7,220 | |
1970 | 6 | 7,811 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |