Shannah Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Shannah?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Shannah would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1931 was reached in 1978 with 51 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Shannah was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Shannah, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1965-1969, and 1974-1977.
For a number of years, the name Shannah has been spiralling downward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Shannah for their newborn has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Shannah?
Shannah's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Shannah is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Shannah has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Shannah (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 7 | 14,306 | |
2013 | 8 | 12,966 | |
2012 | 5 | 19,099 | |
2011 | 5 | 19,107 | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 8 | 13,490 | |
2008 | 16 | 8,044 | |
2007 | 14 | 8,923 | |
2006 | 10 | 11,286 | |
2005 | 19 | 6,491 | |
2004 | 8 | 12,564 | |
2003 | 18 | 6,528 | |
2002 | 19 | 6,087 | |
2001 | 26 | 4,664 | |
2000 | 24 | 4,948 | |
1999 | 31 | 3,878 | |
1998 | 28 | 4,124 | |
1997 | 19 | 5,375 | |
1996 | 31 | 3,617 | |
1995 | 35 | 3,279 | |
1994 | 42 | 2,872 | |
1993 | 45 | 2,714 | |
1992 | 33 | 3,398 | |
1991 | 36 | 3,146 | |
1990 | 41 | 2,841 | |
1989 | 26 | 3,881 | |
1988 | 36 | 2,921 | |
1987 | 43 | 2,429 | |
1986 | 34 | 2,831 | |
1985 | 36 | 2,692 | |
1984 | 36 | 2,616 | |
1983 | 39 | 2,422 | |
1982 | 40 | 2,441 | |
1981 | 46 | 2,223 | |
1980 | 46 | 2,211 | |
1979 | 48 | 2,108 | |
1978 | 51 | 1,931 | |
1977 | 47 | 2,055 | |
1976 | 33 | 2,470 | |
1975 | 30 | 2,602 | |
1974 | 24 | 2,987 | |
1973 | 29 | 2,552 | |
1972 | 24 | 2,887 | |
1971 | 30 | 2,528 | |
1970 | 30 | 2,506 | |
1969 | 33 | 2,243 | |
1968 | 15 | 3,577 | |
1967 | 14 | 3,616 | |
1966 | 8 | 5,193 | |
1965 | 5 | 7,333 | |
1964 | 5 | 7,624 | |
1963 | 9 | 4,839 | |
1962 | 6 | 6,443 | |
1961 | 11 | 4,188 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | 5 | 6,856 | |
1957 | 5 | 6,875 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | 6 | 4,472 | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |