Sagar Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Sagar?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Sagar would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #1470 was reached in 1986.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1993 with 58 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Sagar was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1983-1986, and 1990-1993 the name Sagar took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
For a number of years, the name Sagar has been spiralling downward in popularity. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Sagar lately has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Sagar?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Sagar is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Sagar has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Sagar (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | 5 | 13,840 | |
2016 | 6 | 11,844 | |
2015 | 8 | 9,404 | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | 9 | 8,622 | |
2012 | 5 | 13,824 | |
2011 | 6 | 11,984 | |
2010 | 6 | 11,920 | |
2009 | 10 | 8,178 | |
2008 | 13 | 6,687 | |
2007 | 13 | 6,539 | |
2006 | 9 | 8,599 | |
2005 | 14 | 5,820 | |
2004 | 18 | 4,750 | |
2003 | 20 | 4,246 | |
2002 | 16 | 4,863 | |
2001 | 38 | 2,556 | |
2000 | 26 | 3,277 | |
1999 | 48 | 2,016 | |
1998 | 43 | 2,148 | |
1997 | 56 | 1,749 | |
1996 | 43 | 2,042 | |
1995 | 48 | 1,828 | |
1994 | 53 | 1,710 | |
1993 | 58 | 1,574 | |
1992 | 52 | 1,675 | |
1991 | 43 | 1,859 | |
1990 | 30 | 2,360 | |
1989 | 51 | 1,587 | |
1988 | 46 | 1,590 | |
1987 | 39 | 1,729 | |
1986 | 47 | 1,470 | |
1985 | 24 | 2,282 | |
1984 | 19 | 2,604 | |
1983 | 16 | 2,889 | |
1982 | 21 | 2,407 | |
1981 | 16 | 2,869 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | 6 | 5,926 | |
1978 | 5 | 6,587 | |
1977 | 12 | 3,353 | |
1976 | 8 | 4,347 | |
1975 | 6 | 5,343 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |