Osmond Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Osmond?
Ranking 8,600th in popularity in the United States for boys in 2018, the name Osmond is rare.Osmond, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #1507 was reached in 1912.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1917 with 14 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Osmond in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2012.
Currently, the name is at a high point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Osmond be?
For a number of years, the name Osmond has steadily increased in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Osmond has remained about the same.
The name Osmond is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Osmond (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 9 | 8,600 | |
2017 | 13 | 6,567 | |
2016 | 14 | 6,251 | |
2015 | 11 | 7,396 | |
2014 | 9 | 8,603 | |
2013 | 9 | 8,574 | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 5 | 14,064 | |
2007 | 5 | 13,868 | |
2006 | 12 | 6,789 | |
2005 | 7 | 9,859 | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | 8 | 8,411 | |
2002 | 5 | 11,980 | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 8 | 7,990 | |
1999 | 6 | 9,559 | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | 5 | 10,379 | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | 5 | 9,899 | |
1994 | 8 | 6,808 | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 6 | 8,176 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 5 | 8,180 | |
1987 | 5 | 7,813 | |
1986 | 5 | 7,519 | |
1985 | 5 | 7,303 | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 7 | 5,319 | |
1982 | 5 | 7,078 | |
1981 | 6 | 6,032 | |
1980 | 8 | 4,826 | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 5 | 6,235 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 8 | 3,868 | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | 5 | 4,847 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | 8 | 3,136 | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | 5 | 4,122 | |
1951 | 5 | 4,109 | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | 5 | 4,133 | |
1946 | 5 | 3,887 | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 5 | 3,843 | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | 5 | 4,153 | |
1931 | 7 | 3,318 | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | 11 | 2,654 | |
1926 | 9 | 3,084 | |
1925 | 6 | 4,077 | |
1924 | 6 | 4,228 | |
1923 | 7 | 3,725 | |
1922 | 11 | 2,758 | |
1921 | 6 | 4,211 | |
1920 | 11 | 2,720 | |
1919 | 12 | 2,473 | |
1918 | 11 | 2,660 | |
1917 | 14 | 2,162 | |
1916 | 5 | 4,342 | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | 6 | 3,173 | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | 12 | 1,507 | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |