Osmin Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Osmin?
Ranking 6,218th in popularity in the United States for boys in 2018, the name Osmin is rare.Osmin, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #3964 was reached in 1993.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2006 with 20 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Osmin in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1985.
Currently, the name is at a high point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Osmin be?
For a number of years, the name Osmin has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Osmin has remained about the same.
The name Osmin is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Osmin (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 14 | 6,218 | |
2017 | 12 | 6,977 | |
2016 | 13 | 6,608 | |
2015 | 14 | 6,211 | |
2014 | 13 | 6,527 | |
2013 | 14 | 6,154 | |
2012 | 12 | 6,918 | |
2011 | 14 | 6,163 | |
2010 | 15 | 5,953 | |
2009 | 14 | 6,330 | |
2008 | 15 | 5,976 | |
2007 | 15 | 5,837 | |
2006 | 20 | 4,634 | |
2005 | 15 | 5,498 | |
2004 | 17 | 4,946 | |
2003 | 12 | 6,154 | |
2002 | 16 | 4,851 | |
2001 | 11 | 6,325 | |
2000 | 16 | 4,730 | |
1999 | 11 | 5,944 | |
1998 | 15 | 4,581 | |
1997 | 8 | 7,095 | |
1996 | 11 | 5,438 | |
1995 | 9 | 6,271 | |
1994 | 14 | 4,474 | |
1993 | 16 | 3,964 | |
1992 | 15 | 4,049 | |
1991 | 11 | 5,007 | |
1990 | 10 | 5,273 | |
1989 | 13 | 4,213 | |
1988 | 8 | 5,588 | |
1987 | 10 | 4,486 | |
1986 | 5 | 7,518 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | 6 | 6,116 | |
1983 | 5 | 7,009 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |