Nadeem Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Nadeem?
The rare name Nadeem was the 4,832nd Most Popular Boys Name in the United States in 2018.Nadeem, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #2501 was reached in 1980.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1995 with 23 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Nadeem was less than 5, most recently in 1984.
Approximately during the years 1987-1992, 1998-2001, and 2015-2017 the name Nadeem took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Where is the name Nadeem popularity headed?
Currently, the name is at a very high point when compared to its most popular year.
For a number of years, the name Nadeem has been moving upward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Nadeem for their newborn has risen.
The name Nadeem is very unique but will probably continue to rise upward in popularity.
Nadeem (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 20 | 4,832 | |
2017 | 12 | 6,956 | |
2016 | 16 | 5,688 | |
2015 | 14 | 6,193 | |
2014 | 16 | 5,628 | |
2013 | 10 | 7,917 | |
2012 | 9 | 8,648 | |
2011 | 17 | 5,351 | |
2010 | 16 | 5,650 | |
2009 | 10 | 8,104 | |
2008 | 17 | 5,410 | |
2007 | 14 | 6,160 | |
2006 | 10 | 7,825 | |
2005 | 14 | 5,784 | |
2004 | 17 | 4,932 | |
2003 | 17 | 4,743 | |
2002 | 18 | 4,438 | |
2001 | 22 | 3,804 | |
2000 | 15 | 4,970 | |
1999 | 17 | 4,276 | |
1998 | 13 | 5,086 | |
1997 | 14 | 4,611 | |
1996 | 13 | 4,800 | |
1995 | 23 | 3,067 | |
1994 | 16 | 4,034 | |
1993 | 22 | 3,115 | |
1992 | 21 | 3,176 | |
1991 | 16 | 3,765 | |
1990 | 16 | 3,720 | |
1989 | 16 | 3,563 | |
1988 | 11 | 4,365 | |
1987 | 12 | 3,890 | |
1986 | 13 | 3,588 | |
1985 | 16 | 3,038 | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 14 | 3,177 | |
1982 | 8 | 4,862 | |
1981 | 10 | 4,052 | |
1980 | 20 | 2,501 | |
1979 | 7 | 5,192 | |
1978 | 9 | 4,061 | |
1977 | 7 | 4,942 | |
1976 | 8 | 4,285 | |
1975 | 9 | 3,846 | |
1974 | 10 | 3,495 | |
1973 | 5 | 5,624 | |
1972 | 5 | 5,513 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 6 | 4,567 | |
1969 | 8 | 3,501 | |
1968 | 5 | 4,551 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |